...

    Head of Entity Personal Liability: What Child Safe Organisations Need to Know

Head of Entity Personal Liability: What Child Safe Organisations Need to Know

Safeguarding children and vulnerable people is not solely an operational responsibility. Across Australia, regulators increasingly expect Boards, CEOs, Executive Leaders and Heads of Organisations to actively oversee safeguarding governance and ensure their organisations have effective systems in place to prevent and respond to harm to children and vulnerable people.

When an organisation experiences a serious child safety incident, the focus is not limited to what happened. Regulators are increasingly asking broader questions: Did the organisation have appropriate safeguarding systems in place? Was leadership aware of the risks? Were reasonable steps taken to protect children and vulnerable people?

While organisations are generally responsible for complying with their legal obligations, Australian law recognises circumstances where Directors, Officers and senior leaders may also be held personally accountable for failing to exercise appropriate governance and oversight.

Understanding where personal liability can arise and how to reduce that risk is an important part of leading any organisation  that works with children or vulnerable people.

What Is Head of Entity Personal Liability?

Although “Head of Entity Personal Liability” is not a defined legal term under Australian legislation, it is commonly used to describe situations where the head of an organisation, or other senior leaders such as Directors, CEOs, Executive Managers, Committee Members or Officers, may be personally liable for failing to meet their legal duties.

Incorporated organisations are separate legal entities and are generally responsible for their own actions. However, various Commonwealth and State laws impose personal obligations on those responsible for governing an organisation.

Personal liability does not arise simply because someone holds a position of leadership. Instead, it usually results from a failure to fulfil legal responsibilities, such as ignoring known safeguarding risks, failing to exercise due diligence, neglecting governance responsibilities, or allowing serious compliance failures to continue unchecked.

For organisations working with children and vulnerable people, effective governance is therefore not only good practice, but also an essential legal responsibility.

Why Leadership Accountability Is Increasing

Australia has experienced significant reform across the safeguarding landscape over the past decade. Inquiries such as the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse and the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability identified that organisational failures were often linked to poor governance, weak oversight and leadership inaction.

These inquiries reinforced the important principle that safeguarding must be embedded at every level of an organisation, beginning with leadership.

As a result, regulators now place greater emphasis on whether Boards and Executive Leaders have actively discharged their governance responsibilities rather than simply relying on operational staff to manage safeguarding.

This expectation is reflected through initiatives including:

These frameworks reinforce that safeguarding is a governance issue requiring active leadership, continuous oversight, and organisational accountability.

Directors’ Duties and Leadership Responsibilities

For incorporated organisations, Directors and Officers owe statutory duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), including exercising reasonable care and diligence when carrying out their responsibilities. While these duties apply broadly to organisational governance, they are equally relevant to safeguarding.

Boards and Executive Leaders should ensure that child safety risks are appropriately identified, managed and monitored as part of the organisation’s overall governance framework. Failing to respond to known safeguarding risks or ignoring information highlighting systemic issues may expose both the organisation and its leaders to increased regulatory scrutiny.

Effective leadership involves more than approving policies. It requires actively overseeing whether safeguarding systems are operating effectively in practice.

Child Safety Is a Governance Responsibility

Many organisations appoint Child Safety Officers, Safeguarding Managers, or compliance personnel to coordinate child safety initiatives. While these roles are essential, responsibility for governance remains with the organisation’s leadership.

Safeguarding should not be viewed as a compliance exercise completed once every year. It requires ongoing oversight, regular monitoring, and continuous improvement.

Boards and Executive Leaders should be satisfied that their organisation has appropriate systems to:

  • Effectively implement Child Safe Standards;
  • identify and assess child safety risks;
  • recruit suitable workers and volunteers;
  • provide safeguarding training;
  • respond appropriately to complaints and disclosures;
  • investigate allegations of misconduct;
  • comply with applicable reporting obligations; and
  • regularly review safeguarding policies and procedures.

Due Diligence Means More Than Delegation

One of the most common misconceptions among organisational leaders is that appointing a Child Safety Officer transfers responsibility for safeguarding. It does not.

While operational functions can be delegated, accountability for governance generally remains with the Board and senior leadership.

Due diligence requires leaders to actively verify that safeguarding systems are functioning effectively. This includes ensuring appropriate resources are available, reviewing compliance reports, asking questions about emerging risks, monitoring investigations, supporting continuous improvement, and ensuring legal obligations are being met.

In practice, leaders should be able to demonstrate that they understand the safeguarding risks facing their organisation and have taken reasonable steps to address them. Simply assuming systems are working is unlikely to satisfy modern governance expectations.

Common Governance Failures That Increase Legal Risk

Many safeguarding failures are not caused by the absence of policies but by failures in governance.

Common examples include:

  • Child Safe Standards not being effectively implemented;
  • limited Board oversight of safeguarding matters;
  • outdated child safety policies;
  • inadequate staff and volunteer training;
  • failure to complete child safety risk assessments;
  • poor complaint management processes;
  • delays in investigating allegations;
  • inadequate record keeping;
  • failure to monitor compliance; and
  • treating safeguarding as an operational issue rather than a governance priority.

When these issues remain unaddressed, organisations become increasingly vulnerable to regulatory action and reputational damage.

Questions Every Board and Executive Team Should Be Asking

Strong governance begins with asking the right questions. Boards and Executive Leaders should regularly consider:

  • How do we know our Child Safe Standards are operating effectively?
  • What safeguarding risks have been identified across the organisation?
  • Are child safety complaints being monitored and reviewed?
  • Are investigations conducted appropriately and independently where required?
  • Are workers and volunteers receiving regular safeguarding training?
  • Are our reporting obligations being met?
  • When did we last review our safeguarding policies and procedures?
  • Have we recently undertaken a child safety risk assessment or safeguarding audit?

These discussions help demonstrate active oversight and encourage a culture of continuous improvement.

Building a Stronger Safeguarding Governance Framework

Reducing legal risk is not about eliminating every possibility of harm. Rather, it is about demonstrating that reasonable steps have been taken to protect children and vulnerable people. Strong governance not only supports legal compliance but also helps create safer environments where children and vulnerable people are better protected.

Organisations should regularly review their safeguarding governance by:

  • assessing compliance with Child Safe Standards;
  • reviewing policies and procedures;
  • conducting child safety risk assessments;
  • providing Board and Executive training;
  • monitoring safeguarding performance;
  • reviewing complaint handling processes;
  • undertaking independent safeguarding audits; and
  • continually improving governance systems as legislation and organisational risks evolve

Leadership accountability continues to evolve across Australia’s safeguarding landscape. Boards, CEOs and Executive Leaders are increasingly expected to demonstrate that child safety is embedded throughout their organisation’s governance, culture and decision making.

Personal liability is not about punishing leaders for every incident that occurs. Rather, it reflects the expectation that those responsible for governing organisations will exercise reasonable care, actively oversee safeguarding systems, and take meaningful steps to protect children and vulnerable people.

Organisations that prioritise strong governance, proactive risk management and continuous improvement are better positioned to meet their legal obligations while building safer environments for those they work with.

How Can Safe Space Legal Help?

At Safe Space Legal, we have extensive experience working with organisations across Australia to strengthen safeguarding governance and support leaders in meeting their legal obligations.

Whether your organisation is reviewing its governance framework or strengthening its safeguarding systems, our experienced team can assist with building practical, legally compliant systems and processes that protect children, vulnerable people and your organisation.

Safe Space Legal provides the following services to help organisations meet their legal obligations:

  • Drafting legally sound policies, procedures, and codes of conduct;
  • Providing policy audits and developing safeguarding policies, procedures, and complaint handing processes;
  • Providing root cause analysis to identify gaps in policy and/or practice which put organisations at risk of non compliance with their sector-specific obligations;
  • Conducting safeguarding investigations which are compliant with relevant state and territory legislation and regulations;
  • Delivering tailored safeguarding training to ensure organisations are aware of their sector-specific requirements and obligations;
  • Ensuring that complaints handling and reporting processes are compliant with legal 0wsobligations;
  • Provide sound legal advice on risk mitigation.

Contact office@safespacelegal.com.au or call (03) 9124 7321 to organise a complementary discussion in relation to your organisation’s child safety and safeguarding needs.

Contact us for a 30-minute consultation to discuss your organisation’s safeguarding needs

Patrice Fitzgerald Safe Space Legal
Principal Lawyer and Director | 03 9124 7320  | patrice@safespacelegal.com.au |  + posts

Patrice Fitzgerald is the Principal Lawyer and Director of Safe Space Legal. Patrice has over 20 years of experience working in the legal sector, predominantly in safeguarding and child protection.

Patrice has extensive expertise supporting organisations to comply with their safeguarding obligations. Alongside her role at Safe Space Legal, Patrice is also a Member of the Victorian Civil & Administrative Tribunal in the Review and Regulation List (Child Welfare).